This policy covers:
It does not cover customer agents we are under contract to audit — those are governed by the individual customer engagement and must be reported to us privately rather than publicly.
7B2A · 4C91 · 18DF · E025 · 6A3C · 91BF · A44D · 22E8 · 7712 · 55C1. Full key on our /.well-known/security.txt.Good-faith security research conducted under this policy is authorised. We will not pursue civil or criminal action, nor report to law enforcement, for research that stays within scope, avoids privacy violations, and gives us a reasonable window to fix before public disclosure. If a third party brings action related to research conducted under this policy, we will state that the activity was authorised and will defend the claim where appropriate. — Certius Labs, binding commitment
| Severity | Range | Typical finding |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | €5,000 – €10,000 | Remote code execution, authentication bypass, exfiltration of customer audit data. |
| High | €1,500 – €5,000 | Privilege escalation, stored XSS with impact, severe SSRF. |
| Medium | €300 – €1,500 | CSRF with sensitive action, IDOR on non-critical object, limited information disclosure. |
| Low | €50 – €300 | Low-impact information disclosure, self-XSS, hardening recommendations. |
If we mark something out of scope and you disagree, email a founder directly — andrew@certiuslabs.com. We read everything. We would rather pay a bounty on a marginal finding than have a reporter feel we brushed them off.
This policy is adapted from the disclose.io Core Terms. Rev 1.2 · effective 01 April 2026.